Kathryn Harrison: “female heterosexuality”, May 30, 2010

From OutHistory
Revision as of 19:52, 28 November 2010 by Jnk (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

The first (!) (and the only!) use of the phrase “female heterosexuality” in The New York Times, occurred in a review by Kathryn Harrison of Emma Donoghue’s Inseparable: Desire Between Women in Literature, published in The Times Book Review on May 28, 2010.

Harrison first explains that,

as the work of a lesbian academic, “Inseparable” must establish its relationship to Adrienne Rich’s seminal — sorry, it is a phallo centric popular culture — 1980 essay “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,” which proposed a “lesbian continuum” that includes all relationships between women, regardless of their sexual orientation.

Harrison concludes that Donoghues’

choice not to draw distinctions among friendship, non-incestuous familial attachment and sexual attraction places “Inseparable” in the company of critical works that adopt [Adrienne] Rich’s paradigm, which regards female heterosexuality not as a fact but as an “enormous assumption.”[1]


  1. Kathryn Harrison, “From Sappho to ‘Fried Green Tomatoes’”, New York Times Book Review, May 30, 2010, page BR11.

<comments />